The Model of Elemental Wellbeing: the golden threads and elements that thwart and support wellbeing. — ASN Events

The Model of Elemental Wellbeing: the golden threads and elements that thwart and support wellbeing. (#219)

Annalise Roache 1
  1. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland Central, AUCKLAND, New Zealand

Background: Positive psychology is expanding rapidly, growing in breadth and depth (Kim et al., 2018; Rusk & Waters, 2013), yet there remains a dearth of lived experience informing wellbeing theories and models (Hone et al., 2014; Joshanloo, 2019). If we aspire to design evidence-based interventions that support wellbeing across domains and populations, it is vital to understand fundamental beliefs which drive behaviour.

Aim: This talk presents the findings of a doctoral study that bridges this gap, collecting lay conceptions of wellbeing and comparing them to prominent models and theories to produce the Model of Elemental Wellbeing (MEW).

Method: MEW was developed through a mixed-method study (Big-Qual) with a general sample (n=1064). An online survey (open-ended questions and self-report measures i.e., PHQ-9, Flourishing Scale) collected 200,000 words and 100,000 numerical items. A Reflexive Thematic Analysis process was conducted for theming (n=475; 60.1% female) (Braun & Clark, 2022) and comparative analysis for between-group comparison.

Results: The analysis illustrates that laypeople hold complex and nuanced understandings of wellbeing, and there are noticeable departures from wellbeing models (i.e., meaning, resilience, optimism). The Model of Elemental Wellbeing (MEW) contains four Elements (Inner self, Material Stability, Health, Connection) and three Golden Threads (Balance, Active pursuit, Freedom), which operate as analytical (i.e., a way to understand and evaluate); motivational (i.e., influencing choice and action); and axiological (i.e., judgments of worth and value) principles (Lomas, 2021). A comparative analysis found that all Elements and Golden Threads were present across all categories (i.e., ethnicity, age, sex, gender identity, flourishing, languishing), indicating new findings for wellbeing science. 

Conclusion: This study, located in New Zealand's unique bi-cultural environment (Māori/European), provides an opportunity to understand the influence of indigenous knowledge of wellbeing beyond the WEIRD samples often found in positive psychology studies. The Model of Elemental Wellbeing, informed by laypeople, offers a multifaceted perspective of wellbeing, representing mind, body, hedonic, eudemonic, subjective and objective drivers that support and thwart wellbeing. 

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. . (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
  2. Hone, L. C., Jarden, A., Schofield, G. M., & Duncan, S. (2014). Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 4(1).
  3. Joshanloo, M. (2019). Lay conceptions of happiness: Associations with reported well-being, personality traits, and materialism. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2377.
  4. Kim, H., Doiron, K., Warren, M., & Donaldson, S. (2018). The international landscape of positive psychology research: A systematic review. International Journal of Wellbeing, 8(1).
  5. Lomas, T. (2021). Life balance and harmony. International Journal of Wellbeing, 11(1).
  6. Rusk, R. D., & Waters, L. E. (2013). Tracing the size, reach, impact, and breadth of positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(3), 207-221.
  • Please select up to 3 keywords from the following list to best describe your submission content: Complexity, Health and Medicine, Interdisciplinarity
#IPPAWorldCongress